Responding to user context

I’m looking at a statement from a Chinese user about Lewandowski's penalty history in La Liga. They mention he blasted a penalty over against Atletico Madrid and that he has missed 4 out of 12 total penalties in his career. I think they might want some additional context or stats. Since my last training data goes up to October 2024, I need to respect that and avoid making claims about future matches or stats that aren't in my knowledge base.Crafting a response
I’m thinking about how to address the user's comment regarding Lewandowski's penalty stats in La Liga. First, if we assume what they said is true, his conversion rate would be around 66.7% (8 out of 12). I should include some context by comparing that to the average conversion rate for top strikers, which is typically around 75-80%. I want to remind them that I can’t independently verify this. Acknowledging the user in Chinese would be thoughtful too! I'll keep the response concise and focused.Formulating a response
I'm considering how to present Lewandowski's penalty stats and their implications for Barcelona. I want to say that he had a higher conversion rate during his time at Dortmund and Bayern, with more fluctuation in La Liga. I think I should mention potential penalty takers like Gündogan, Ferran, and Raphinha. I’ll provide the conversion math: 8 scored out of 12 attempts, giving a rate of 66.7%. I should ask if the user wants a brief post or graphic too. I'll keep everything concise!
如果消息属实,这意味着:
说明:我无法直接核验这场最新数据;若你要,我可以整理他在巴萨阶段的点球明细(时间、对手、主罚脚、方向、结果)并做可视化对比。需要哪种呈现:1) 简表 2) 趋势图 3) 社媒短帖文案?